Jesus The Atlantean

Christ Descendant Of Atlantis

When Jesus was born, it threatened the growing rule of the roman empire and catholic church (Not officially organized at the time), so the Romans [and others] set out to kill all first born thinking they could get to Jesus and stop him AND his lineage. But Jesus was special and would survive to bring the message to the world that they are divine and that we are all divine, of course that message got hijacked..But since so many people were power and money hungry, Jesus was betrayed, hung on the cross and left to die but not before having several children with Mary Magdalene, he did not die on the cross though, in fact, he escaped which is why when Mary went to his tomb to claim his body he wasn’t there..it was because Jesus was a healer of others AND himself and was greatly loved by his disciples who somehow managed to help him escape.

Jesus and others escaped and began the teachings in the secret mystery schools and in India..[with others] sharing the truth of his descent and the truth of the roman empire and catholic church in coded messages in the bible. Unfortunately Jesus did not want to be king or messiah, but he did it for his people because had he not stepped forward, unfortunately the roman empire and the catholic church would of decimated the holy land and the Jews [and others] had he not.

The pope sits there and speaks of unconditional love and acceptance, ha, I was even told there are “Smear campaigns” to ruin the character of anyone who descends from that line :(..how awful is that?. For example the Knights Templar which everyone hates now a days and everyone thinks is evil, were smeared by agents of the church, what the Templar’s were originally doing was protecting the documents of this truth and the descendants from the roman empire…until they were infiltrated by members who were secretly working for the catholic church.

The “war between Satan and Michael” it wasn’t at all a war between Satan and Michael as there is no evidence in any “other” ancient text (before the bible) to support any actual physical hell and much less a hell with demons, what happened was that there was a difference in opinion between the priest of trials who in those times was called the adversary, or as is commonly known Satan, I was told the angels who appear in texts, they appear so because they resided on Earth [at that time]..and so, Michael, Gabriel, Satan and others have resided on earth and were one of the founders of the human race and thus Atlantis, they were celestial messengers or ancient astronauts. Odin, king David, Jesus etc. and Satan’s role was to test and tempt initiates of the mystery schools…Michael had a problem with how far Satan would go in his testing and that is when the two went in to battle, Michael removed Satan from his title because it was UN fair, Jesus spoke of every one being accepted and loved, but the Satan did not agree with that, he was weary and cautious, maybe even too over protective, and filled with fear, so much that this proved him unfit for his title and Michael removed him.

what do you expect from the one who is assigned to protect against the roman catholic church and humanity itself? he must be a strong and trying individual, filled with the darkness he must maintain in order to recognize it. Its no wonder the pope said recently, “what is wrong with pedophilia? it was normal back in my day” he said that publicly! I cant believe the church is STILL in power after that. The merkaba was used by the seraphim and copied as a symbol by the people of Atlantis then was passed down to other star born which then became known as the star of David..that’s just my opinion however.

P.S. When I say catholic church I don’t mean all people of the world who are catholic or are catholic priests, I mean, the Vatican itself and the roman empire refers to the empire (Or enforcers of the ) that answers to the pope and the Vatican itself NOT (ALL) roman people of Italy. Just to get that straight :). There is no denying however that the influence of religious leaders and institutions such as the Vatican that have controlled and manipulated the humanity for ages, for example:

The Origin Of The Word Nephilim
In the Hebrew Bible and several non-canonical Jewish and early Christian writings, nephilim means the fallen [ones] are a people created by the cross-breeding of the “sons of God” and the “daughters of men”. The word nephilim is loosely translated as giants or titans in some Bibles, and is left untranslated in others.

The phrase “sons of God” is sometimes translated into English as “sons of gods”. The Hebrew word, “Elohim”, is a plural form, but is often used with single verbs and adjectives (as in this case) when the single meaning is traditionally understood.

The traditional Jewish view, deriving from the Book of Enoch, is that the fathers of the nephilim, the “sons of God”, were the Grigori (a class of fallen angels also called the Watchers); however, there is some controversy on this point.

Some commentators suggest the nephilim were believed to have been fathered by members of a proto-Hebrew pantheon, and are a brief glimpse of early Hebrew religion, most of the details of which was later edited out from the Torah. Others, especially some Christians, suggest the “sons of God” were fully human. It is sometimes suggested that ridding the Earth of these nephilim was one of God’s purposes for flooding the Earth in Noah’s time.

Despite the literal text of the Bible and its traditional interpretation, the idea that heavenly beings mated with humans is controversial, particularly among Christians, who cite the teaching of Jesus in the Book of Matthew that angels do not marry (they may take the verse in question out of context because Jesus said that the resurrected don’t marry in heaven but are as the angels).

Others who find the idea of angels mating with humans as distasteful have suggested more figurative interpretations of the nephilim, such as the idea that they were the offspring of men possessed by demons.Still others, including the Ethiopian Orthodox Church, take the traditional view of Genesis 6:1 that the allusion refers to some men, from the godly lineage of Seth, called sons of God (an expression denoting those in covenant relationship with YHWH, cf. Deuteronomy 14:1; 32:5), began to pursue fleshly interests, and so took wives of the daughters of men, i.e., those who were unbelievers descended of Cain. This is also the view presented in a few extra-biblical, yet ancient works, particularly the Second Book of Adam and Eve. —Source Unknown

As you can see, there is no definite meaning of the word Nephilim.

Like with most all things, this was another concept that was wrongly attributed to be associated with evil, Jesus himself as unpopular as this may be was himself a child of the angels, messengers from heaven who resided at one time in Atlantis. But there has a been a long history of death, violence and corruption at the hands of those who first destroyed history. At the time of Jesus birth there was a “Group” if you will that didn’t want his birth to be possible….or his rule, further more, many of the Scribes of that time were forced to write in code, but why? hence the story of the crucifixion by the Romans, it was a lot deeper then what is traditionally taught in the bible. the “Conspiracy” goes much deeper then what the modern churches teach about the birth of Jesus and his bloodline. I resolve to follow alternative ancient history that goes beyond the accepted theories of so called alternative history. The roman empire already wanted to establish a more powerful kingdom and because of their wanting to establish a more powerful kingdom, they wanted this messiah to be no where in the picture. The roman people themselves had many different beliefs, but the sect that crucified Jesus, had their own beliefs AND agenda, otherwise they would not have crucified him, or rather, tried to.

We all have different beliefs but my own belief is that he did not die, and continued on to India and other places. There are many factors that prove this if one digs enough around, that Jesus in fact did not die on the cross. In the book Bloodline Of The Holy Grail it talks about how things were coded in the bible to mean other things, such as the lion referring to the Roman Empire and it describes in great detail the struggle between Priests, the Roman Empire, the Jews and the birth of Christ in to this madness:

The Untold Story
The untold intervening period was immensely significant, for it set the political scene in to which the awaited Messiah was to make his entrance. The year began with the rise of power of Alexander the Great of Macedonia, who defeated the Persian Emperor Darius in 333 BC. Destroying the city of Tyre in Phoenicia, he then moved in to Egypt and built is citadel of Alexandria. With full control of the enormous Persian Empire, Alexander then pressed on through Babylonia, moving ever eastward, until he finally conquered the Punjab. At his early death in 323 BC his generals took control. Ptolemy Soter became Governor of Egypt, Selecus ruled Babylonia, while Antigonus governed Macedonia and Greece. By the turn of the century, Palestine was also enveloped within the Alexandrian Empire. At that stage a new force gathered momentum in Europe: the Republic of Rome. In 264 BC the Romans ousted the Carthaginian rulers of Sicily-also capturing Corsica and Sardina. The great Carthaginian general, Hannibal, then retaliated by seizing Saguntum (In modern Spain) and advanced with his troops across the Alps, but he was checked by the Romans at Zama. Meanwhile Atiochus III (a descendant of the Macedonian general Selecus) became king of Syria. By 198 BC he had rid himself of Egyptian influences to become master of Palestine.

His son, Atiochus IV Epiphanes, then occupied Jerusalem-an action that promptly gave rise to a Jewish revolt under the Hasmonaean priest Judas Maccabaeus. He was killed in battle, but the Maccabees achieved Israelite independence in 142 BC. In a continuing struggle the Roman armies destroyed Carthage and formed the new province of Roman North Africa. Further campaigns brought Macedon, Greece and Asia minor under Roman control. But disputes raged in Rome because of Carthaginian (or Punic) wars had ruined the Italian farmers while simultaneously enriching aristocracy, who built large estates utilizing slave labor. The Democrat leader Tiberius Graccus put forward proposals for agrarian reform in 333 BC, but he was murdered by the Senatorial Party. His brother took up farmers’ cause and he too was murdered, with the Democrat leadership passing in to the military commander Gaius Marius. By 107 BC Gaius Marius was Consul of Rome. But the Senate found its own champion in Lucius Cornelius Sulla, who eventually deposed of Marius and became Dictator in 82 BC. A horrifying reign of terror ensued until the Democrat statesmen and general Gaius Julius Caesar gained popularity and was duly elected to primary office in 63 BC. In that same year, Roman legions marched to the Holy Land, which was already in a state of turmoil.

The Pharisees, who observed rather strict ancient Jewish laws, had risen in protest against the more liberal Greek culture. In so doing, they also opposed the priestly caste of Sadducees, and the unsettled environment rendered the region ripe for invasion. Seeing their opportunity, the Romans, under Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus (Pompey The Great), subjugated Judea and seized Jerusalem, having annexed Syria and the rest of Palestine. Meanwhile, the Roman hierarchy, was undergoing its own upheavals. Julius Caesar, Pompey and Crassus formed the first ruling Triumvirate in Rome, but their joint administration suffered when Caesar was sent to Gaul and Crassus went to supervise matters in Jerusalem. In their absence, Pompey changed political camps, deserting Democrats for the Republican aristocrats-whereupon Caesar returned and civil war had ensued. Caesar was Victorious at Pharsalus, In Greece, and eventually gained full control of the imperial provinces when Pompey fled to Egypt. Until that time queen Cleopatra VII had been ruling Egypt jointly with her brother, Ptolemy XIII. But then Caesar visited Alexandria and conspired with Cleopatra, who had her brother assassinated and began to rule in her own right. Caesar went on to campaign in Asia Minor and North Africa, but on his return to Rome in 44 BC he was murdered by Republicans on the Ides of March.

His nephew Gaius Octavius (Octavian) formed a second Triumvirate with General Mark Antony and the statesmen Marcus Lepidus. Octavian and Mark Antony defeated the foremost of Caesar’s assassins, Brutus and Cassius, at Philippi in Macedonia, but Antony then deserted his wife Octavia (Octavian’s sister) to join Cleopatra. At this, Octavian declared war on Egypt, and was victorious at the Battle of Actium, following which Antony and Cleopatra committed Suicide. Palestine, at that juncture, was composed of three distinct provinces: Galilee in the north, Judea in the south, and Samaria between. Julius Caesar had installed the Idumaean Atipater as Procurator of Judea, with his son Herod as the Governor of Galilee-but Antipater was killed shortly afterwards whereupon Herod was summoned to Rome and there appointed King of Judea. To the majority subjects, Herod was an Arab usurper. He had converted to a form of Judaism, but he was not of the Davidic succession. In practice, Herods authority was confined to Galilee since Judea governed by the Roman Procurator at Caesarea. Between the two of them, the regime was harsh in the extreme, and more then 3,000 summary crucifixions were carried out to coerce the population in to submission.

Prohibitive taxes were levied, torture was common place, and the Jewish suicide rate leapt alarmingly, This was the brutal environment in to which Jesus was born: a climate of oppression controlled by a puppet monarchy backed by  highly organized military occupational force. The Jews were desperate for their long awaited Messiah (‘Anointed One’-from the Hebrew verb maisach, ‘to anoint’), but there was no thought of this Messiah being divine. What the people wanted was a forceful liberator to secure their freedom from the Roman overlords. Among the famous Dead Sea Scrolls , the text known as the War Rule sets out a strategy for the ultimate battle, naming Messiah as the supreme military commander of Israel. The books (Dead Sea Scrolls) papyrus leaves contained an assortment of Scriptures, written in tradition of early Christian works, but with Jewish overtones, they became known as the Nag Hammadi Library. The books were written in the ancient Coptic language of Egypt during early Christian times. The Coptic museum in Cairo asserted they were in fact, copies of much older works originally composed in Greek. Indeed, some of the texts were discovered to have very early origins, incorporating traditions from before AD 50. They tend to portray an environment very different from that described in Bible.

The cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, for example, are not presented as centers of wickedness and debauchery, but as cities of great wisdom and learning. More to our purpose, they describe a world in which Jesus gives his own account of the Crucifixion, and in which his relationship with Mary Magdalene reaches enlightening new proportions. The excavations at Qumran have produced relics dating back from about 3500, at which time (during the Bronze Age) the settlement, was a Bedouin camp. The period of formal occupation seems to have commenced in about 130 BC. Jewish chronicles describe a violent Judean Earthquake in 31 BC and this is confirmed at Qumran by a break between two distinct times of habitation. According to the Copper Scroll, old Qumran was called Sekhana. The second residential period began during the reign of Herod The Great (c. 37-4 BC). Herod was an Idumaen Arab, installed as King Of Judea by the Roman authorities who had first taken control of the region Julius Caesar. Apart from the evidence of the scrolls, a collection of coins has also been amassed from the Qumran settlement, relating to a time-span from the Hasmonaean ruler John Hyrancanus (135-104 BC) to the Jewish Revolt of AD 66-70.

The uprising in 168 BC, in which the priestly caste of Hasmonaean Maccabees came to prominence, was prompted largely by the action of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes of Syria, who had foisted a system of reconsecrated Greek worship upon the Jewish community, The Maccabees later reconsecrated the Temple but, successful as the Jews were against Antiochus, internal social damage had been done because the campaign had necessitated fighting on the Sabbath. A core of ultra strict Jewish devotees known as the Hasidim (Pious ones) strongly objected to this and, when the triumphant house of Maccabeeus took control and set up their own king and high priest in Jerusalem, Hasidism not only voiced their opposition but marched en mass out of the city in order to establish their own ‘pure’ community in the near by Wilderness of Qumran. Building works started in around 130 BC. Many relics of the time have since been discovered and, during the 1950s, more then a thousand graves were unearthed and Qumran.

A vast monastery complex from the second habitation was also revealed, with meeting rooms, plaster benches, a huge water  cistern and a maze of water conduits. In the scribes’ room were ink-wells and the remains of the tablets on which the Scrolls had been laid out-some more then 17 feet (c5 meters) in length. It was confirmed, by archaeologists and scholars, that the original settlement had been damaged in the Earthquake and rebuilt by the incoming Essenes in the later Herodian era. The Essenes were on of the three main philosophical Jewish sects  (The other two being the Pharasees and the Sadducees). Many biblical manuscripts have been found at Qumran, relating to such books as Genisis, Exodus, Deuteronomy, Isaiah, Job and others. Of particular interest are certain biblical commentaries compiled by the scribes in such a way as to relate the Old testament texts to the historical events of their own time. Such a correlation is especially manifest in the Scribes’ commentary on the Psalms and on such prophetical books as Nahum Habakkuk and Hosea. The Technique applied to link Old Testament writings like these with the New Testament era was based on the use of ‘eschatological knowledge’ -a form of coded representation that used traditional words and passages to which were attributed special meanings relevant to contemporary understanding. These meanings were designed to be understood only by those who knew the code. The Essenes were trained in the use of this allegorical code, which occurs in the Gospel texts in particular relation to those parables heralded by the words’ for those with ears to hear’.

When the scribes referred to the Romans, for example they wrote of the Kittim-ostensibly a name for Mediterranean coastal people, which also used to denote the Ancient Chaldeans, whom the Old Testament   describes as “that bitter and hasty nation which shall march through the breadth of the land to possess dwelling places that are not theirs’ (Habakkuk 1:6). The Essenes resurrected the old world for use in their own time and enlightened readers knew that Kittim always stood for Romans. In Order that the Gospels should be beyond Roman understanding they were largely constructed with dual layers of meaning-evangelical scripture on the surface and political information on the substitution codes laid down by the Scribes. However a working knowledge of the code was not available until some of the Dead Sea Scrolls were recently published. Dr Thiering explains the code in very straightforward terms. Jesus for example was referred to as the ‘Word Of God’. Thus, a superficially routine passage such as that in 2-Timothy 2:9, ‘The word of God is not bound’, would be apprehended at once to concern Jesus-in this case meaning that Jesus was not confined. Similarly, the Roman Emperor was called the Lion. Being ‘resurrected from the lion’s mouth’, therefor, meant escaping the clutches of the Emperors officers. Study of the Scrolls-particularly the Pesharim, the Manual Of Discipline the Community Rule and the Angelic Liturgy-reveals a number of such coded definitions and pseudonyms that were previously misunderstood or considered of no particular importance. For instance, the ‘poor’ were not poverty stricken, under privileged citizens; they were those who had been initiated in to the higher echelons of the community and who, on that account, had been obliged to give up their property and worldly possessions. The ‘many’ was a title used for the head of the celibate community, whereas the ‘crowd’ was a designation of the regional Tetrarch (Governor) and a ‘multitude’ was a governing council.

The novices within the religious establishment were called ‘children’. The doctrinal theme of the community was known as the Way and those who followed the principles of the Way were known as the Children Of Light. The term ‘lepers’ was often used to denote those who had not been initiated in to the higher community, or who had been denounced by it. The ‘blind’ were those who were not party to the Way and could therefore not see the Light. In these respects, texts mentioning ‘healing the blind’ or ‘healing a ‘leper’ refer more specifically to the process of conversion by the Way. Release from excommunication was described as being ‘raised from the dead’. The definition ‘unclean’ related mostly to uncircumcised Gentiles, while the description ‘sick’ denoted those in public or clerical disgrace. Additionally, some of the esoteric terms in the New Testament were not merely descriptive of people’s social status, but were titles of which had special relevance to Old testament tradition. The doctrine which the community regarded as its guiding message was the Light, and this was represented by a high ranking triarchy (corresponding, respectively, to Priest, King and Prophet) who held the symbolic titles of Power, Kingdom and Glory. In the clerical patriarchy the Father was supreme and his two immediate deputies were designated his Son and his Spirit.

Some of the most important non-biblical records of the New Testament era have been preserved in the writings of Flavius Josephus, whos Antiquities of the Jews and Wars of the Jews were written from a personal standpoint, for he was the military commander in the defense of Galilee during the Jewish Revolt in the 1st Century AD. Josephus explains that the Essenes were very practiced in the art of healing and received their therapeutic knowledge of roots and stones from the Ancients. Indeed, the term Essene might well refer to expertise, for the Aramic word asayya meant physician and corresponded to the Greek word essenoi. A fundamental belief of the Essene was that the universe contained two fundamental spirits of Light and Darkness. Light represented truth and righteousness, whereas Darkness depicted perversion and evil. The balance of one against the other in the cosmos was settled by celestial movement and people were individually apportioned with degrees of each spirit, as defined by their planetary circumstances of birth. The cosmic battle between Light and Darkness was thus perpetuated within humankind and between one person and another: some contained proportionally more Light, others proportionally more Dark.

God was held to be the supreme ruler over the two cardinal spirits, but to find the Way to the Light required following a long and arduous path of conflict. Such a path culminated in a final weighing of once force against the other at a Time of Justification, later called the Day of Judgement. It was thought that, as the time drew near, forces of Darkness would gather in strength during a period of Temptation. Those who followed the Way of Light sought to avoid the impending evaluation with the plea, ‘Lead us not in to Temptation, but deliver us from evil’. By tradition the spirit of Darkness was identified with Belial (Worthless), whose children (Deuteronomy 13:13) worshiped Gods other then Jehovah. The spirit of Light was upheld by the hierarchy and was symbolized by a seven-branched candlestick, the Menorah. In the time of the Davidic kings, the Zadokite priest was considered the foremost proponent of Light. But just as the Spirit of Light had its Representative on Earth, so too did the Spirit of Darkness. It was an appointment held by the Chief of the Scribes, whose purpose was to provide a formal opposition with the hierarchical structure.

A primary responsibility of the designated Prince Of Darkness, was to test female initiates within the celibacy, in which capacity he held the Hebrew title of Satan (Accuser). The equivalent title in Greek was Diabolos (aggressor), being the origin of the English world ‘Devil’. (The Satan’s office was not unlike that of the Devil’s advocate, who probes the background of potential candidates for canonization in the Roman Catholic Church.) In the book revelation (16:16), the great final war between Light and Darkness-between good and evil-is forecast to take place at Armageddon (Har Megiddo: the heights of Megiddo), an historically important Palestinian battlefield where military fortress guarded the plains of Jesreel, south of the Galilean hills. The War Scroll describes in detail the forthcoming struggle between Children Of Light and the Sons of Darkness. The tribes of Israel were to be on one side, with the kittim (Romans) and various factions on the other. In the context of this climatic war, however, there is no mention of an omnipotent Satan-such mythical imagery played no part in the community’s perception of the Final Judgement. The conflict was to be purely mortal affair between the Light that was Israel and the Darkness of Imperial Rome. Much later, the fundamental notion behind this ancient concept was purloined and adapted by the emergent Church of Rome. The symbolic battle of Har Megiddo was removed from its specific location and reapplied on a world scale, with Rome (the hitherto Darkness) uprising the Light in its own favor.

In order that the rule of the Catholic bishops should prevail, it was strategically decreed that the Day of Judgement had not yet come. Those who obeyed the revised principles of the Roman Catholic Church were promised the right of Entry to the Kingdom of Heaven, as sanctified by the bishops. The one-time hill-fort of Har megiddo was thereby invested with supernatural overtones, so that the very word Armageddon took on the hideous ring of apocalyptic terror. It implied the fearsome ending of all things, from which the only sure route to salvation was absolute compliance with the rule of Rome. In this regard, it has proved to be one of the most ingenious political maneuvers of all time.  To make a REALLY already long post short! One of Jesus’s foremost problems was that he had been born into an environment of controversy over whether or not he was legitimate. It was for that very reason that Mary and Joseph took him to Simeon the Gabriel for legitimizing under the Law (Luke 2:25-35). Despite this endeavor by his parents, Jesus evoked a mixed response and the Jews were polarized in two opposing camps on the subject of his own lawful status in the kingly line.

He had been conceived at the wrong time of year and had been born before Joesph and Mary’s wedlock was formalized by their second Marriage. Six years later his brother James was born within all the rules of dynastic wedlock and there was no disputing his legitimacy. Hence, the opposing factions each had a prospective Messiah to support. The Hellenists (westernized Jews) claimed that Jesus was the rightful Christ (Greek: Christos-King), whereas the orthodox Hebrews contented that the kingly entitlement lay with James. The argument persisted for many years but, in AD 23, Joesph-the father of both candidates-died and it became imperative to resolve the dispute one way or the other. Through long prevailing custom, the Davidic kings were allied to the dynastic Zadokite priests and the prevailing Zadok was Jesus’s own kinsman, John the Baptist.

He had risen to prominence in AD 26 upon the arrival of the Roman governor, Pontius Pilate. John the Baptist was very much of the Hebrew persuasion, but Jesus was a Hellenist. John therefor supported James, even though he acknowledged Jesus as legitimate and baptized him in the Jordan. It was because of the Baptist’s attitude that Jesus realized he must make a stand for, if the prospect of a revived Jewish Kingdom were to gain momentum, he would undoubtedly lose out to his brother James. In view of this, he decided to create his own organized party of supporters: a party that would not follow any conventional social policy. His vision was straightforward, based upon the logic logic that a split Jewish nation could never defeat the might of Rome. But he perceived that too that the Jews could not accomplish their mission if they continued to hold themselves separate from Gentiles (native non-Jews). Jesus’s ambition for the kingdom of Israel was one of harmonious, integrated society, but he was more then frustrated by the unbending Jews of rigid Hebrew principle. Jesus knew full well that tradition had prophesied a Messiah who would lead the people to salvation, and he knew how desperately that Messiah was craved. John the Baptist was too much of a recluse to fulfill that role.

James, meanwhile, was doing little to aid his own prospects, apart from relaxing in the comfort of High Priest Caiaphas’ and the Baptist’s support. And so, from a once reserved position, Jesus stepped into the public domain, resolving to give the people their long awaited Messiah. After all, he was the first born son of his father, no matter what the wrangling priests and politicians had to say on the subject. In a short while he gathered his disciples, appointed his twelve Apostles (delegates) and began his ministry. In this, he sought acceptance in a world where he perceived no selection by class, conviction or fortune-promoting an ideal princely service that was to carve its mark in time.

So was Jesus a starseed? absolutely, he was a starseed, a star visitor and so much more, he truly was the peoples King. he descended of the line of King David whom descended from Orion who descended from the Sumerians who descended from the Atlantians who were the ones who from heaven came to help our Earth evolve.